The arbitrary number of Dukes reflects the course of the Eighteenth Century rather than an erroneous number of “lords a leaping.”
(c) National Trust, Hardwick Hall; Supplied by The Public Catalogue Foundation
I actually dealt with the First Duke of Devonshire in my previous post as he was also the fourth earl. Having invited William and Mary to take the Crown in the Glorious Revolution of 1688 he conveniently died in 1707 having helped to negotiated the union of the kingdoms of England and Scotland. Despite his reputation for brawling and womanising he clearly did evolve into a serious political figure. This happened following his return from his Grand Tour when he entered the houses of Parliament principally because he was anti-Charles II and anti-Catholic. There was also the small matter of Colonel Culpepper as described in yesterday’s post. In addition to becoming a duke he was also made Lord High Steward by King William in grateful recognition of his services.
The First Duke was unusual in his family in that he was a Whig, i.e. he wanted parliamentary government rather than a government dominated by the monarchy. Presumably his uncle the Duke of Newcastle and his father the Third Earl must have been spinning in their graves. Roy Hattersley explains that the Whig attitude was that men of birth were endowed with a duty to protect the interest of the nation (of course, it helped if they prospered at the same time.) The basic caveat was that the men of birth should have land because the soil was the physical embodiment of their duties and responsibilities. Johnson described the first Whig as being the Devil! This description came about because these powerful men not only believed that they had a duty to protect the nation but that they could do what they wanted when they wanted irrespective of the law – which may be a bit of a swinging statement but you get the gist. Suffice it to say Horace Walpole described the first duke as “a patriot amongst the men and a gallant among the ladies – ” a stamens which had nothing to do with Cavendish’s manners.
William’s education followed the pattern of his father and grandfather. He was sent on a Grand Tour and then he entered into local politics and administration. He sat for Derbyshire but then lost his seat -again to his father’s irritation. However, this proved to be to his advantage as he then gained a seat in South Yorkshire. His corresponding member was Robert Walpole. The pair became firm friends and, let’s face it, it’s always handy to know a prime minister. In 1707 William became the Second Duke of Devonshire.
His arch enemy in political terms in Derbyshire was the Tory, Henry Sacheverell. The rise of Henry reflected the rise of the Tories in national government and William found himself out of his job as a privy councillor. Instead of sulking he had an amendment added to the Act of Settlement identifying the Elector of Hanover’s eldest son as an additional heir to the Crown. It reflected William’s protestantism as averse to the Tory High Church view of the world that came perilously close to Catholicism in William’s mind. It should be noted that not only did William support the established church but spoke out for dissenters as well. When Queen Anne died on August 1 1714 William rose once more with the role of Lord Steward of George I’s household.
There was an interlude whilst James III’s son, the so-called Old Pretender, made a bid for the throne getting so far as Preston before being beaten. Bills were passed against Catholics. Later he opposed the South Sea Bubble scheme which he argued would have horrible effects on the economy. He even managed to be friends with both George I and the Prince of Wales – a fairly unusual state of affairs.
In 1737 he became the Viceroy, General Governor and Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, his mother after all was the daughter of the First Duke of Ormonde. The Duke remained in post for the next seven years returning to England just in time for the next round of Jacobite plotting.
Arriving home in January 1745 the third duke became Lord Steward of the Royal Household – not that it stopped the Duke from spending his time in Derbyshire. By September England was in uproar over the arrival of Bonnie Prince Charlie in Scotland. On September 28th 1745 there was a meeting at the George Inn in Derby for the purpose of raising a militia. I’ve posted recently about the inglorious activities of the Derbyshire Blues who headed in the direction of Nottingham as soon as they realised that Derby was the next stopping point for the Jacobite army. The duke not known for his martial tendencies had expressed concern about his valuables. It was this duke and his wife who are the direct ancestors of both Prince Charles and Princess Diana. The third duke died in December 1755. His wife survived him by twenty-two years.
And that is as far as I propose to go down the line of Cavendish dukes. The Sixth duke (another William ) is known to history as “the Bachelor Duke” and when he died the title passed to the descendants of the third son of the fourth duke.
Hattersley, Roy. (2014) The Devonshires: The Story of a Family and a Nation. London:Vintage Books
Pearson, John. (1984) The Serpent and the Stag. New York: Holt Reinhart
